Social media platform 'X' (formerly twitter) told the Karnataka High Court on Thursday (April 2) that the Central ...

X Corp has argued that the mechanism lacks the legal safeguards outlined under Section 69A of the Information Technology (IT) ...

Senior advocate K G Raghavan, appearing for X Corp, argued that the Supreme Court had upheld the validity of Section 69A in ...

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday declined to grant interim relief to Elon Musk-owned X Corp in its legal battle against the Indian government’s Sahyog portal blocking mechanism. A bench led by ...

Social media giant X Corp (formerly Twitter) on Thursday told the Karnataka High Court that it fully intends to comply with ...

Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, appearing for the government, said that all intermediaries operating in India must ...

and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Shreya Singhal case. The government asserted that the petitioner had misinterpreted the provisions of the Information Technology (IT) Act, particularly ...

The company argues that this creates an illegal parallel system for content regulation and violates the Supreme Court’s 2015 Shreya Singhal judgment. The legal challenge comes amid increasing ...

and the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Shreya Singhal case. However, the government contended that Section 69A explicitly allows the Centre to issue blocking orders under specific conditions and ...

In its petition, X challenged the Centre’s use of Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology (IT) Act to block content ...

Ashwini Vaishnaw has said that the government's policies are aimed at ensuring a safe, trusted and accountable internet to ...