March 18 - A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence without human input cannot be copyrighted under U.S. law.

The case involving a Pissarro is being sent back to federal court in California for review in light of a new state law, in a dispute between heirs and a Spanish museum. By Christopher Kuo One of ...

The US Supreme Court has sent a Nazi-looted art claim over a painting at the Museo Nacional Thyssen-Bornemisza in Madrid back to the lower federal appeals court to reconsider who owns the work ...

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ... 2018 covering "A Recent Entrance to Paradise," a piece of visual art he said was made by his AI system. The office rejected his ...

A U.S. federal appeals court today ruled that art created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be granted copyright protection. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals for the District of ...

The Iowa Supreme Court says the Des Moines Police Department must turn over information on the use of force by officers. Harvey Harrison, the founder of the non-profit group Just Voices ...

US Appeals Court Rejects Copyrights for AI-Generated Art Lacking 'Human' Creator By Blake Brittain A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed ...

A federal appeals court ruled that art created autonomously by artificial intelligence cannot be copyrighted, saying that at least initial human authorship is required for a copyright.

WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court in Washington, DC, on March 18 affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence (AI) without human input cannot be copyrighted under US law.

does not prohibit copyrighting work that was made by or with the assistance of artificial intelligence," a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said ...