Attorney Stuart Silverman says the First Circuit’s widening the divide on the False Claims Act’s causation standard adds to ...

NY climate lawsuit is one of many designed to let states abuse the courts to do what they have failed to do otherwise -- ...

Test-takers must understand causal arguments and how to distinguish them from statements of conditional logic.

"This ruling prevents the unfair practice of pointing to an ‘empty chair’ at trial and ensures that injured parties have a ...

A lower court should have heard expert testimony showing a Montgomery County woman’s pregnancy could have been extended, the ...

After the case survived a motion to dismiss, Co-Diagnostics brought on Doug Greene, Genevieve York-Erwin and their team at ...

Social media content creators—including a golden doodle, a video essayist, and a fashion blogger—accusing PayPal Inc. and ...

Lawyers need to avoid being “so seduced” by what AI can do “that they don’t appreciate what it cannot”, a professional ...

The board will not agree to compensate a worker simply because their anxiety or depression gets exacerbated because of ...

Recently the Minnesota Supreme Court recognized a claim for negligent selection of an independent contractor in Alonzo v.

Argumentum ad populum is another type of a logical fallacy that argues for the truth of a claim based on its widespread belief.